Нина Ташевская (Редактор отдела «Среда обитания»)
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
，这一点在新收录的资料中也有详细论述
assert thin([1,2,3], [False, True, False]) == [2]，详情可参考新收录的资料
15+ Premium newsletters by leading experts，这一点在新收录的资料中也有详细论述
Note in the example below the need to alias count() as counter to match the target table's column name: